← Back to all trials
Not Yet Recruiting
NCT05631353
TADs Anchored vs Conventional Anchored Carriere Motion Appliance
Conditions: Class II Malocclusion
Sex: All
Ages: 11 Years – 16 Years
Healthy volunteers: 1
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 20
Sponsor: Al-Azhar University
Location: Egypt
Summary
Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) was designed to correct a Class II molar relationship into a Class I relationship by distalizing the whole posterior maxillary segment by means of class II elastics and mandibular anchorage.
To revoke the adverse effects of CMA with class II elastics, we can use the CMA to distalize the maxillary posterior segment with TADs anchorage using miniscrews.
The aim of this study is to evaluate TADs anchored CMA vs. conventionally anchored CMA for distalization of the maxillary buccal segment.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Adolescent patients aged 11-17 years.Unilateral or bilateral Class II molar relationship.Bilateral Class II canine relationship.No history of previous orthodontic treatment.No malformed teeth, impacted teeth and unerupted teeth.No systemic disease.Good oral hygiene.No abnormal pressure habit.No periodontal diseases.No missing teeth in maxillary arch.Exclusion Criteria:The need for extraction in the lower arch.Posterior crossbite.Presence of any craniofacial anomalies.Patients with syndromes.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05631353). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.