Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in... | Clinical Trial | StuddyBuddy@endsection Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis
Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Completed NCT05709236

Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis

Conditions: Jaw, Edentulous

Sex: All
Ages: 56 Years – 70 Years
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 28
Sponsor: Delta University for Science and Technology

Location: Egypt

Summary

28 participants with edentulous maxillary arches were randomly selected and enrolled in two equal groups; Group I conventional impression group (CIG) and Group II Digital impression group (DIG). All patients were rehabilitated with maxillary screw-retained implant prosthesis retained by 6 implants. Prosthodontic complications and peri-implant MBL were registered at 6,12, and 24 months (m). Data was collected and statistically analyzed.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:patients with maxillary edentulous ridges opposing fully dentulous mandibular arch or with a minimum of six anterior teeth (canine to canine), and the utmost one or two premolar/molar missing in any quadrantpatients with compromised facial/lip support seeking a fixed prosthesis for their edentulous maxillahaving edentulous maxilla with adequate bone density and height to place six implants as assessed clinically and radiographically, and physicallypsychologically eligible patients for implants placement.Exclusion Criteria:debarred medically compromised patientssmokerspatients suffering from parafunctional habits.

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05709236). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.