International Registry of Intra-arterial and Endosaccular Flow Diverters (IRF)

This multicenter retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate and compare the technical performance, safety, and clinical outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents and endosaccular flow disruptors.

Inclusion Criteria: * Consecutive adult patients (18 years of age or older) * Underwent endovascular treatment with one of the following devices: a. Endoluminal Flow Diverter Stents: i. Pipeline Flex (Covidien, California, USA) ii. Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology (Covidien) iii. Surpass Streamline (Stryker Neurovascular, California, USA) iv. Surpass Evolve (Stryker) v. Silk flow diverter (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) vi. Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention) vii. Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device X (FRED X; MicroVention) viii. p64 Flow Modulation Device (phenox GmbH) ix. Endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) (eCLIPsTM, eVasc Neurovascular, Vancouver, BC, Canada) b. Intrasaccular Flow Disruptors: i. Woven EndoBridge (WEB; MicroVention) ii. Luna/Artisse System (Medtronic) iii. Medina Embolic Device (Medtronic) iv. Contour Neurovascular System (Cerus Endovascular) v. Neqstent Coil Assisted Flow Diverter (Cerus Endovascular) vi. pCONus and pCANvas (phenox GmbH) vii. Nexus Aneurysm Embolization System (EndoStream Medical) viii. CITADEL™ Embolization Device (Balt, USA) * Complete medical records and follow-up data available Exclusion Criteria: * Incomplete procedural or follow-up records * Non-flow-diverter or non-flow-disruptor treatments (e.g., coiling-only cases) * Aneurysms treated with investigational devices not listed within Inclusion Criteria