← Back to all trials
Completed
NCT06817460
A Clinical Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Two Surgical Pathways for Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
Conditions: Benign Tumor of Uterus, Surgical Approaches, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Sex: Female
Ages: 18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 312
Sponsor: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Location: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou Jiangsu
Summary
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary strategy to improve perioperative outcomes and accelerate patient recovery. This study aims to compare ERAS-related and perioperative outcomes between multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) in patients undergoing total hysterectomy for benign or premalignant uterine diseases.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. age ≥ 18 years;
2. an indication for total hysterectomy, including leiomyoma, adenomyosis, abnormal uterine bleeding, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasm (EIN);
3. and a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of both TU-LESS and MPLS surgical approaches, willingness to undergo either procedure, and provision of written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. concomitant vulvar, vaginal, or appendiceal pathologies requiring concurrent surgical intervention;
2. confirmed or suspected invasive malignancy.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06817460). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.