← Back to all trials
Completed
NCT06871020
Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs
Conditions: Mandibular Distal-extension Prostheses
Sex: All
Ages: 20 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 24
Sponsor: Ain Shams University
Location: Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University Cairo
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to assess periodontal health and patient satisfaction in mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures using CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite versus porcelain-fused-to-metal extracoronal attachments. Twenty-four participants with bilateral mandibular Kennedy Class I, retaining only the canines and first premolars as the last standing abutments bilaterally, will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group I (n=12) will receive OT extracoronal attachments made from CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite, while Group II (n=12) will receive OT extracoronal attachments made from porcelain-fused-to-metal. All participants will then receive a metallic removable partial denture. The null hypothesis states that no significant differences will be observed in periodontal health and patient satisfaction between the two attachment types.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Mandibular partially edentulous bilateral distal extension Kennedy Class I with first premolars as last abutments.
2. The opposing maxillary arch will be dentate.
3. Angle class I maxillomandibular skeletal relation.
4. The distal extension ridge will be well-formed and covered by healthy and firm mucosa.
5. As verified by periapical radiographs, Abutments have healthy periodontal ligaments and an appropriate crown/root ratio (CRR).
6. Crown/root ratio of the premolar abutment teeth is not less than 1:1. 5.
7. The vertical distance between the ridge tissue and the opposing teeth of the study cases is not less than 7 mm. 6.
8. The buccolingual dimension of the abutment teeth is not less than 6 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients with any systemic disease that could affect the rate of bone resorption, which was confirmed by obtaining a through medical history.
2. Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism and clenching).
3. Patients with any septic foci or impacted teeth as proved by panoramic radiograph, as well as patients with tilted or rotated abutments or soft tissue undercuts in areas that will be involved in the RDP design.
4. Patients with any TMJ problems.
5. Patients with any neuromuscular diseases.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06871020). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.