I-scoop vs. C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope for Airway Manag... | Clinical Trial | StuddyBuddy@endsection I-scoop vs. C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope for Airway Management Under Spontaneous Breathing and Analgosedation
Join us at Health Research Day — June 6th at Canton Waterfront Park, Baltimore!   Learn More →
← Back to all trials
Not Yet Recruiting NCT07624162

I-scoop vs. C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope for Airway Management Under Spontaneous Breathing and Analgosedation

Conditions: Airway Management

Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: No
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 200
Sponsor: Hannover Medical School

Location: Hannover Medical School Hanover Lower Saxony

Summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether the videolaryngoscope i-scoop makes airway management under spontaneous breathing and analgosedation more clinically practicable than the established standard device, the C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope, in adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Is good clinical practicability - defined as a successful, easy, and complication-free intubation under spontaneous breathing - more frequently achieved with the i-scoop than with the C-Mac D-Blade? Researchers will compare the standardized airway management procedure under spontaneous breathing using either the i-scoop or the C-Mac D-Blade. Participants will: * continue breathing on their own during the procedure * be randomly assigned (1:1) to one of the two videolaryngoscopes * receive standardized analgosedation and topical lidocaine anesthesia of the upper airway before the breathing tube is placed * be asked about discomfort and recall of the procedure after surgery (in the recovery room, on postoperative day 1, and at 7 days post-intubation) by a blinded interviewer

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * Scheduled surgical procedure or intervention under general anesthesia * Capacity to give informed consent (free and independent decision-making capacity) * Willingness to provide written informed consent after comprehensive verbal and written information about study aims, procedures, and risks Exclusion Criteria: * Lack of, or withdrawal of, written informed consent * Lack of capacity to consent or legal guardianship for health-related decisions * Insufficient German language skills for qualified verbal and written informed consent (exclusion to protect patients, since legally valid and substantively meaningful consent is not possible without secured language comprehension) * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Current opioid therapy or chronic opioid therapy discontinued less than 1 month before the procedure * Known drug or alcohol dependence * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to lidocaine or its excipients (glycerol, propyl-4-hydroxybenzoate, methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate) * Severe psychiatric disorder impairing capacity to consent or to cooperate * Indication for nasal intubation * Non-pain-related limitation of mouth opening to less than 16 mm * Severe comorbidities with particular risk in the context of the study intervention (e.g., unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease, uncontrolled epilepsy) * Participation in another clinical study within the previous 30 days that could influence the present study question

Interested in this study? View the official listing for contact and enrollment details.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07624162). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.