Digital Technology-Informed Stroke Rehabilitation

The goal of this study is to determine the effects of lab and home-based technology guidance during movement training post-stroke. The study will compare movement training informed by lab-based technology to training delivered with technology at home. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How well do lab and home-based technologies help individuals post-stroke improve their movement patterns? * Is there a difference in improvement between the in-lab and at-home training groups? * Which technologies lead to the most improvement?

Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 30-85 years. * Diagnosis of stroke. * Stroke onset of at least six months prior to the time of participation. * Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity between 30-50 (mild-moderate) * Cognitive skills to consent and actively participate, as indicated by scores of ≥ 24 on the Mini- Mental Status Examination * Able to visit lab up to 5x per week for 3 weeks Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of severe aphasia preventing the ability to follow 1-step directions at least 80% of the time. * Excessive spasticity of the wrist, elbow, and shoulder, defined as a Modified Ashworth Score \>2. * Diagnosis of neurological disorders other than stroke. * Orthopedic/musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., severe arthritis) affecting the upper extremity. * Currently or planning to become pregnant. * Participation in concurrent occupational therapy. * Unilateral neglect, defined as failure of the Line Bisection Task * Upper extremity pain \>= 7/10 on Numeric Rating Scale