Conventional, High-Intensity Laser, and Magnetic Field Therapies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of conventional physical therapy, high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), and pulsed magnetic field therapy (PMFT) in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The study evaluates changes in pain, symptom severity, functional status, hand grip strength, and electrophysiological findings following treatment. Researchers will compare the outcomes of the three treatment approaches to determine whether HILT or PMFT provides additional clinical benefits beyond conventional therapy. The findings may help clinicians select the most appropriate conservative treatment strategy for patients with CTS.

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) * Mild-to-moderate CTS not requiring surgical intervention * Positive Tinel's sign * Received treatment at the participating center(s) within the past five years * Complete pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical assessment records * Completion of the prescribed treatment protocol Exclusion Criteria: * Previous carpal tunnel surgery or indication for surgical intervention Incomplete medical records * Failure to complete the treatment protocol * Presence of concomitant upper extremity disorders that could affect study outcomes * Presence of neurological, orthopedic, or systemic conditions that could influence the clinical assessments