Evaluating Narrative Vaping Prevention Video Ads for Adolescents and Young Adults

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persuasive effectiveness of narrative advertisements: with acted-out plots (where characters enact a vaping-related experience) versus narrative advertisements without acted-out plots and control. Using a 3-arm between-subjects randomized design, approximately 1,910 adolescents and young adults (aged 13-20) in the U.S. who vape or are susceptible to vaping will be recruited online. Participants will be randomly assigned to view video ads from one of three conditions (narrative with acted-out plots, narrative without acted-out plots, or control videos) and complete a post-exposure survey evaluating message engagement, emotional response, perceived effectiveness, and psychological reactance.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 13-20 years old. * Current vaper or at risk of vaping. Participants will be considered as a current vaper if they report using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days. Participants will be considered as "at-risk of vaping" if they answer anything other than "definitely not' to 3 screening items assessing their susceptibility to vaping (e.g., "If one of your best friends were to offer you a vape, would you use it?" Response options: definitely not, probably not, probably yes, definitely yes). * Live in the United States Exclusion Criteria: * Younger than 13 years or older than 21 years.