← Back to all trials
Not Yet Recruiting
NCT07826403
Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws
Conditions: Anterior Mandibular Fracture
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 16
Sponsor: Cairo University
Summary
This study compares two methods for fixing fractures of the front part of the lower jaw:
Conventional plates and screws Headless compression screws
Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Researchers will use imaging to see whether either method causes a significant change in the position of the mandibular condyles, which are the parts of the jaw that connect to the jaw joints.
Why it matters: Proper condylar position is important for normal jaw movement, chewing, and overall TMJ function.
Main goal: To determine whether conventional plates or headless compression screws provide better preservation of condylar position after surgery.
The study may help surgeons choose the most appropriate fixation technique for patients with anterior mandibular fractures.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult patients of age from 18 years or older, irrespective of the gender.
* Recent single isolated anterior mandibular fracture (symphyseal or parasymphyseal) indicated for open reduction and internal fixation.
* Dentate or partially dentate patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Comminuted fractures.
* Medically compromised patients contradicting surgical intervention under general anaesthesia.
* Patients younger than 18 years.
* Completely edentulous patients.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07826403). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.