← Back to all trials
Completed
NCT07848711
Comparison of Two Expansion Techniques for Horizontal Bone Deficiency
Conditions: Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss, Implant Therapy, Primary Stability of the Implants, Complication, Periodontal Health
Sex: All
Ages: 18 Years – N/A
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Phase: NA
Enrollment: 20
Sponsor: Ege University
Location: Ege University Izmir Bornova
Summary
This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ege University. Patients exhibiting horizontal bone insufficiency (residual crest width \< 4 mm) in the posterior mandible received dental implants with two techniques: osseodensification or crest split. The investigator compared to clinical and radiological outcomes of these techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* a residual horizontal alveolar crest width of less than 4 mm
* clinical indication for at least two implants
* good systemic health
Exclusion Criteria:
* patients requiring vertical augmentation
* tooth extraction prior or peri-surgery
* presence of acute local infection or pathology at the operative site
* allergy to titanium, anesthetics, or surgical materials
* pregnancy or lactation
* history of bisphosphonate or antiresorptive use
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07848711). StuddyBuddy aggregates publicly available trial information.