Comparison of Two Patient Education Methods in Women With Chronic Low Back Pain: Online Pain Education vs. AI-Driven Patient Education on Pain Beliefs, Catastrophizing, and Self-Efficacy

The goal of this study is to learn if ChatGPT-generated answers can improve pain beliefs, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy in women with chronic low back pain compared to supervised pain education. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ChatGPT improve pain beliefs, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy in women with chronic low back pain? Is ChatGPT as effective as supervised pain education? Participants will: complete baseline questionnaires online, attend a single 30-60 minute online session (randomly assigned to either a supervised pain education presentation or asking frequently questions about low back pain to ChatGPT)

Inclusion Criteria: * To be between 30 and 60 years old * To have pain lasting longer than 3 months * To have pain intensity greater than 4 out of 10 * Ability to communicate effectively and understand the study procedures * Ability to conduct video calls via Microsoft Teams and complete questionnaires via Google Forms. * To be volunteer to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Having previously received pain neuroscience/education or having asked questions regarding pain to ChatGPT or any other chatbots * Being pregnant * Diagnosis of endocrinological, psychiatric, urogenital, neurological, dermatological, cardiorespiratory, or musculoskeletal diseases, and/or sleep disorders that could interfere with the study outcomes * Currently undergoing other treatments for low back pain (e.g., physical therapy, acupuncture).